Subject: Re: [boost] Is there interest in a collection of call stack utilities?
From: Aurelian Melinte (ame01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-14 08:30:05
> Boost.Test might be interested in using something like this. I noticed though
> this is header only solution. I do not think this would be acceptable to me
> (given all the lower level system details one need to have inside of the
> implementation). Otherwise looks interesting.
I have noted the concern. This is an easy change.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk