Subject: Re: [boost] [Fibers] Performance
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-14 14:00:18
2014/1/14 Hartmut Kaiser <hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden]>
> I'd be disappointed if the overheads imposed by Boost.Fiber are only 2-3
> times smaller than for kernel threads. I'd expect it to impose at least 10
> times, if not 15-20 times less overheads than kernel threads (at least
> that's the numbers we're seeing from HPX).
yes - I'm disappointed too. but, as I already explaned, I was focused on
and to provide a ways to synchronized coroutiens with an interface similar
tuning seams to need more attention from my side - at first I've to
identify the bottlenecks.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk