Subject: Re: [boost] [Fibers] Performance
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-15 16:13:30
2014/1/15 Hartmut Kaiser <hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden]>
> IMHO, Boost.Fiber is a library which - unlike other Boost libraries - has
> not been developed as a prototype for a particular API (in which case I'd
> all for accepting subpar performance). It clearly has been developed to
> provide a higher performing implementation for an existing API. That means
> that if Oliver is not able to demonstrate superior performance over
> implementations, I wouldn't see any point in having the library in Boost in
> the first place.
As I explained several times in this review - boost.fiber aims to provide a
to synchronize/coordinate coroutines as it was requested on the dev-list
some months ago.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk