Subject: Re: [boost] [Fibers] Performance
From: Dean Michael Berris (dberris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-16 02:29:29
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Oliver Kowalke
> 2014/1/15 Hartmut Kaiser <hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden]>
>> Wake up Oliver - you're up to the forefront of parallel computing and you
>> don't realize it!
> why do you allege that?
> for me semantics and usability of boost.fiber is more important than
> performance tuning is mostly an issue of implementation details and can be
> after the API is stable and proven.
> but this might not to apply to all developers - you are free to choose the
> tool of your preference.
I realize I'm jumping in on a conversation that I'm not involved in
but as mostly a user of Boost libraries, I for one would encourage you
to think about the users and their needs more than what you the
developer think is important. This is one critical piece of feedback
you're getting, and I seriously hope you consider prioritizing this in
your continued development of Boost.Fiber.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk