Subject: Re: [boost] [Fibers] Performance
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-16 08:28:10
> > I realize I'm jumping in on a conversation that I'm not involved in
> > but as mostly a user of Boost libraries, I for one would encourage you
> > to think about the users and their needs more than what you the
> > developer think is important. This is one critical piece of feedback
> > you're getting, and I seriously hope you consider prioritizing this in
> > your continued development of Boost.Fiber.
> Did I say that I'll ignore Hartmuts concerns?
> For Hartmut only speed matters and I've agreed that I'll address this
I've never said that it's only speed that matters. I said that because the
API is set there is only performance which could be used as a criteria to
decide whether your library is a worthy addition to Boost (besides
implementation quality, which is sub-standard as others have pointed out).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk