Subject: Re: [boost] [Fibers] Performance
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-21 07:44:55
On 20 Jan 2014 at 19:48, Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
> BTW, if the author would have referred to
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3747.pdf, all these
> misunderstandings could have been avoided...
That's a good paper, but I wish it didn't claim to be a *universal*
model for asynchronous operations because that model is completely
unsuitable for persistent storage i/o. I had that argument with
Nicholas @ Microsoft Research actually, and I think I may well have
persuaded him as they're seeing the same problems of fit.
-- Currently unemployed and looking for work in Ireland. Work Portfolio: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk