|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber review January 6-15
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-23 11:31:48
2014/1/23 Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]>
> One point of mine not mentioned in the report is that I would really
> like to see Boost Fibers graphed against Windows Fibers on that
> performance scaling graph.
>
it would be more correct to compare boost.context's fcontext with Windows
Fibers than boost.fiber
AFAIK Windows Fibers do not have a scheduler - ifyou want WinFibers
scheduled you would have to write your own
(as boost.fiber does)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk