Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber review January 6-15
From: Nat Goodspeed (nat_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-23 18:20:01
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Lars Viklund <zao_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> As for reposting over and over again, the existing top-level post is
> probably reasonably fine for most people.
> It'd be nice if whoever does the review of the next Boost library ends
> up doing it "right" from the beginning :)
Consider me educated.
I will take this as advice for future reviews, rather than a call to
repost this one.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk