Subject: Re: [boost] [docs][website] Can the docs on the website be xhtml +svg?
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-01 07:23:53
On 31 January 2014 18:05, John Maddock <john_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> However, now that you've jogged my memory(!), I see there are some docbook
> xsl params for setting the document type and adding:
> <xsl:param>chunker.output.doctype-public="-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
> To the build options produces output which looks OK locally, and as it's
> HTML it doesn't need to be served as xml either, so I think that's problem
That's what I was doing on the 'new-style' branch. The problem is that
the rendering changes a little in standards mode. One problem is that
margins are different in tables, to fix that I added to the CSS:
table th > *:first-child,
table td > *:first-child
table th > *:last-child,
table td > *:last-child
Which seems to work okay. I was also trying to convert it to use more
consistent units for fonts.
> PS You could use the above mechanism to get a HTML 5 doctype - however it's
> unlikely that boostbook actually generates valid HTML?
I think it does, but even in not, it's close enough. We could use the
alternative HTML5 doctype:
<!DOCTYPE html SYSTEM "about:legacy-compat">
But I don't know if browsers respect it. The 4.01 doctype should be fine.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk