Subject: Re: [boost] SQL: next iteration of sqlpp11
From: Mateusz Åoskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-04 15:11:33
On 4 February 2014 17:46, Rodrigo Madera <rodrigo.madera_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Sebastian Theophil <stheophil_at_[hidden]
>> using boost::optional is the canonical solution that is also impossible to
> This is the solution that the competing library SOCI uses .
> Rodrigo Madera
>  http://soci.sourceforge.net/doc/3.2/boost.html
I'd suggest to not to consider the two as competing libraries,
but rather complementing.
Please, refer to Roland's comparison  w/ major difference outlined
"sqlpp11 assumes that you know your tables at compile time"
In fact, there is room for some collaboration 
"option would be to write a sqlpp11 connector library for SOCI"
-- Mateusz Åoskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk