Subject: Re: [boost] [algorithm] Review Request: edit_distance
From: Phil Endecott (spam_from_boost_dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-05 10:26:34
Erik Erlandson <eje_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I have received your request and will add the library to the
>> review schedule.
> Thank you Ron!
> I have a question.
> I was looking at the current review schedule:
> Taking the '10 days per review' as typical, it appears that
> there is a six-month backlog of reviews. Assuming 10 day
> review sessions, back to back. That seems like a long backlog,
> am I missing something?
As a proposed addition to Boost.Algorithm, my understanding is
that this applies (from the Boost.Algorithm introduction):
I will be soliciting submissions from other developers, as
well as looking through the literature for existing algorithms
to include. [...]
My goal is to run regular algorithm reviews, similar to the
Boost library review process, but with smaller chunks of code.
To date I don't believe that any code other than the originally-
reviewed content has been added to Boost.Algorithm. Marshall,
are you reading this? How do you propose to handle it?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk