Subject: [boost] [testing] More failed test results with no meaningful content
From: John Maddock (jz.maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-06 14:22:54
leads to a successfully compiled file if you follow the links.
Anyone any idea what's going on here, and is there any way to make this
reporting more reliable? Frankly the results will get widely ignored if
no one can see what's actually going on.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk