Subject: Re: [boost] [Config] Macros for the absence of a full C++11 <memory> implementation
From: Ahmed Charles (acharles_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-11 00:29:36
> From: lists_at_[hidden]
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:46:25 +0200
> Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost] [Config] Macros for the absence of a full C++11 <memory> implementation
> The above three macros, plus the additional BOOST_NO_CXX11_STD_ALIGN, would
> cover the whole C++11 <memory> except for the reachability functions (which
> nobody needs)... and std::addressof, which is pretty useful. Perhaps we need
> to add BOOST_NO_CXX11_ADDRESSOF while we're at it.
Boost has boost::addressof, which does the same thing as the standard one, so there probably isn't much reason to detect the standard one.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk