Re: [boost] [Config] Macros for the absence of a full C++11<memory> implementation

Subject: Re: [boost] [Config] Macros for the absence of a full C++11<memory> implementation
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-12 19:27:30

Peter Dimov wrote:
> Apart from that, I prepared the patch and submitted a pull request.

We should actually define BOOST_NO_CXX11_STD_ALIGN for Dinkumware
version 540. Though it provides std::align in <memory> it is a
non-conforming implementation; i.e. it adjusts the pointer correctly
but it does not return the correct address. Dinkumware version 610 has
it implemented correctly.

Glen