Subject: Re: [boost] [Config] Macros for the absence of a full C++11<memory> implementation
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-12 19:27:30
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Apart from that, I prepared the patch and submitted a pull request.
We should actually define BOOST_NO_CXX11_STD_ALIGN for Dinkumware
version 540. Though it provides std::align in <memory> it is a
non-conforming implementation; i.e. it adjusts the pointer correctly
but it does not return the correct address. Dinkumware version 610 has
it implemented correctly.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk