Subject: Re: [boost] [Config] Macros for the absence of a full C++11 <memory> implementation
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-17 04:48:35
> We could say that x.run passes iff
> testing.capture-output is skipped
> because a dependency failed or has
> non-zero exit status. But... this
> will make a mess of the total pass/fail
> counts and will fail badly with -q,
> not to mention that it will cause the
> test to pass if a library dependency
> fails to build.
I realise this may not be possible, but a better rule would be a "not"
rule: passes only if it's dependency failed. But like you say, the
total pass/fail count would presumably be messed up?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk