Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Convert. Take 2.
From: Vladimir Batov (Vladimir.Batov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-17 17:48:45
Andrzej, it's certainly flattering to hear that but truth be told
'convert' does embarrassingly *very* little by itself -- when
tr1::optional (or extended boost::optional) are be available, 'convert'
will simply use/deploy the functionality provided by "optional". So, in
the end, 'convert' is trying to become famous on the backs of smarter
On 02/18/2014 09:28 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
> Wow, I failed to appreciate what this library can do. Now I can see
> you described this "lazy evaluation" trick later in the docs, but I
> made my judgement based solely on Introduction. I really am lazy. I
> will read thoroughly all the documentation before I make any further
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk