Subject: Re: [boost] [build] Headers rule does both too much and too little
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-18 17:07:47
Steven Watanabe wrote:
> Are the testers using incremental builds?
I don't think so. This run, for example:
is apparently using an old version of shared_count.hpp, and there's no
fails due to a missing config/user.hpp. Doesn't appear incremental as well.
appears to be using an old version of assert.hpp.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk