Re: [boost] [build] Headers rule does both too much and too little

Subject: Re: [boost] [build] Headers rule does both too much and too little
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-18 17:07:47

Steven Watanabe wrote:

> Are the testers using incremental builds?

I don't think so. This run, for example:

http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/output/teeks99-02e-win2008-64on64-boost-bin-v2-libs-smart_ptr-test-allocate_shared_alloc11_test-test-msvc-12-0-debug.html

is apparently using an old version of shared_count.hpp, and there's no 
yellow i.

This one:

http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/output/VC8%20jc-bell-boost-bin-v2-libs-smart_ptr-test-allocate_shared_alloc11_test-test-msvc-8-0-debug.html

fails due to a missing config/user.hpp. Doesn't appear incremental as well.

This one:

http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/output/DebSidC++-boost-bin-v2-libs-assert-test-assert_exp_test-test-gcc-4-8-2~11-debug.html

appears to be using an old version of assert.hpp.