Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Convert. Take 2.
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-21 20:49:53
On February 21, 2014 5:04:13 PM EST, Vladimir Batov <vb.mail.247_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>Still what I am puzzled by is that lexical_cast performance table in
>the docs claims to be far ahead of scanf... and I cannot reproduce
>their numbers. :-(
Perhaps that's because you're using newer hardware or libraries than they used for their tests.
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk