Subject: Re: [boost] Library metadata
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-23 21:55:32
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Robert Kawulak
> Just an idea: it seems like this approach is not too flexible given that there
> are numerous standards/TRs/TSs coming now and in the future that possibly
> include Boost libraries. Instead of adding a new field for each one of them,
> maybe it would be better to have one "std" field with a list specifying in which
> standard/TR/TS a library is included/proposed for?
Something flexible, like a list, would be good. In Boost.Smart_Ptr, we
have class templates like shared_ptr and function templates like
make_shared that are part of C++11, but the Boost implementations are
now improved and proposed for the next standard (N3920 in TS1, and
N3939 in TS2).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk