Subject: Re: [boost] [signals2] Test failure in C++11 (trivial fix for incorrect usage of boost::optional)
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-27 08:14:25
Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> I read the explanation of the problem referred to in the original December
> post, however it seems to me the bug is in optional's safe-bool
> implementation under c++11. That is, the expression "max==false" should
> implicitly convert the optional "max" to a boolean and compile.
The C++11 "explicit operator bool" feature is stricter than the safe bool
idiom. !max is fine, because !x is considered a boolean context for x; max
== false is not, because x == y is not a boolean context for x or y.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk