Subject: [boost] Boost summer of formal reviews
From: Borislav Stanimirov (b.stanimirov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-03-11 06:29:15
This is a (half-)joke suggestion.
There are currently 19 libraries in the review schedule (
http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html ) which need a
review manager (yes, including mine). Some of them have been there for
Instead of focusing on getting people to write new libraries, which
could potentially end up stuck in the review schedule (like AFIO), why
don't we focus on getting the reviews for the ones that are already
there. Or at least revising the review process.
For example, I would be willing to review some of these libraries, but I
am not qualified to be a review manager (since I am not very active in
I am not saying that most (or any) of the libraries stuck in review
limbo, should pass the process, but some of them at least deserve a look
(again, like AFIO).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk