Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost summer of formal reviews
From: Erik Erlandson (eje_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-03-11 16:08:22

> To get a willing peer review manager a library already needs to
> become popular enough, so we already have that too. For example, not
> enough people are using AFIO, therefore no one wants to peer review
> manage it, therefore I agree AFIO should not enter Boost until it is
> popular enough -

This makes some sense, but... if it doesn't get into Boost, how does it become popular? As a policy, it's in danger of circular dependency: "AFIO never made it into Boost because it wasn't popular. It never got popular because it never made it into Boost..."

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at