Re: [boost] [range] Proposal: addition of front(), back(), at(), operator[]

Subject: Re: [boost] [range] Proposal: addition of front(), back(), at(), operator[]
From: Adam Wulkiewicz (adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-03-25 12:22:49

Hi,

Krzysztof Czainski wrote:
> 2014-03-23 20:59 GMT+01:00 Adam Wulkiewicz <adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden]>:
>
>> be intuitive. So the following should also be provided:
>>
>> 4. sub(), subscript(), el(), element(), at_index(), at_(), index(),
>> indexed(), access(), operator[], ...?
> +1 for subscript(rng,n).
> -1; for operator[], I'd definitely prefer a named function call.
>   The name 'at' would be a perfect name, if it only didn't have the throwing
> behavior in the Standard Library.
>

I'd add

on(rng, i)

in(rng, i)

the last might also be related to the word 'index'.

Regards,
Adam