Subject: Re: [boost] New numeric data type proposal
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-03-28 04:53:20
>> It still seems quite a bit different from what Damian was suggesting. Performance is the main driver for those weird types ("usual" rationals would work), and a different performance profile will fit completely different applications.
> I agree on the different application profiles.
> Do you think this data type can have a place in the Boost.MultiPresicion Library?
It would seem to be the logical place for it, so if you want to write
it, then submissions are always welcome ;-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk