Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost-users] [typeindex v3.0] Peer review begins Mon 21st ends Wed 30th
From: Gavin Lambert (gavinl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-04-23 18:54:55
On 24/04/2014 04:56, quoth Klaim - Joël Lamotte:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Nat Goodspeed <nat_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I don't suppose boost::typeindex would be an improvement? That name at
>> least immediately suggests to the reader which library to look up.
> In my opinion, even boost::typeidx would be an improvement over
+1 to boost::typeindex. (And +0.5 to boost::typeidx.)
boost::typeind makes me think "type indirection" or "type
indeterminate". Which I suppose isn't an entirely bad association under
the circumstances, but is probably not what was intended.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk