Subject: Re: [boost] noexcept BOOST_EXPLICIT_OPERATOR_BOOL
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-04-26 07:17:51
On Saturday 26 April 2014 14:42:40 you wrote:
> On Friday 25 April 2014 23:14:54 Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
> > 2014-04-25 22:23 GMT+02:00 Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>:
> > > On Friday 25 April 2014 20:21:03 Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
> > > > 2014-04-25 17:15 GMT+02:00 Andrey Semashev
> > > > > I think, noexcept could be added to the existing macros rather
> > > > > safely
> > > > > using
> > > > > BOOST_NOEXCEPT_IF/BOOST_NOEXCEPT_EXPR. I could do it if no one
> > > > > objects.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, make it noexcept if operator! is noexcept. That couldn't possibly
> > >
> > > hurt
> > >
> > > > anyone.
> > >
> > > Hmm, I forgot that the noexcept argument requires the enclosing class
> > > type. I
> > > cannot use 'this' to deduce the type, so it seems to be not possible to
> > > implement with the current interface. The good news is that the
> > > constexpr
> > > version is implicitly noexcept already.
> > Does it make sense then to add yet another macro?
> > (BOOST_NOEXCEPT_EXPLICIT_OPERATOR_BOOL)
> A new macro sounds reasonable.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk