Re: [boost] [random] new threefry random engine

Subject: Re: [boost] [random] new threefry random engine
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-02 11:57:02

AMDG

On 05/02/2014 05:39 AM, John Salmon wrote:
> 
> Yes.  But with C++11 initializer lists, random_value is a one-liner:
> 
> unsigned random_value(unsigned i){
>     return Threefry<2, unsigned>()({i})[0];
> }
> 

Sure, that works, as long as you don't mind throwing
away the rest of the outputs.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe