Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] Request review of new synchronisation object, boost::permit<>
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-04 16:25:07
Niall Douglas wrote:
> A non-consuming permit looks quite like a Win32 event object yes, except
> it has stronger guarantees useful for many-waiter many-signaller
What are these stronger guarantees?
> A consuming permit looks totally different to Win32 event objects.
You do know that WIn32 events can be auto-reset or manual-reset, right? Is
not an auto-reset event the same as a consuming permit?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk