Subject: [boost] [atomic] Constraints on failure_order?
From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-05 14:55:08
According to :
"The compare_exchange_weak/compare_exchange_strong variants taking
four parameters differ from the three parameter variants in that they
allow a different memory ordering constraint to be specified in case
the operation fails."
According to std::atomic there are some constaints on failure_order. Is
this also the case for boost::atomic?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk