Subject: Re: [boost] Modularizing [Re: Anyone is interested in being review manager of âApplicationâ?]
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-16 05:09:43
On May 16, 2014 3:48:13 AM EDT, Stephen Kelly <hello_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>Niall Douglas wrote:
>> I'd forget about modularising
>> compatibility Boost, it is what it is.
>Given that no one else responded on this point, it seems conclusive:
>doesn't want to make any steps (which I previously showed to be
>toward a goal of modularizing the code before the big bang described
A more reasonable conclusion is that Boost wants to get its head above water, following the Git transition, before taking on more disruptive changes. Nevertheless, it would be easier to accept such a change add part of a new and separate branch.
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk