Re: [boost] Foundational vs non-foundational libraries (was: Re: Thoughts on Boost v2)

Subject: Re: [boost] Foundational vs non-foundational libraries (was: Re: Thoughts on Boost v2)
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-21 08:49:09

On 21 May 2014 at 15:45, Peter Dimov wrote:

> Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > Those who want Boost to provide a bridge between C++03 and C++11 because 
> > they can't use C+11 should stick to "Legacy Boost" (whether that's v1.x or 
> > some fork that goes into maintenance mode) and not hold back interesting 
> > new development.
> 
> I don't understand. Who are those hypothetical people holding back 
> interesting new development? 

Start reading at:

http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/c-11-td4648532.html

Niall

-- 
ned Productions Limited Consulting
http://www.nedproductions.biz/ 
http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/