Subject: Re: [boost] Thoughts on Boost v2
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-22 17:29:02
On 22 May 2014 at 15:06, Nevin Liber wrote:
> > I also proposed in my OP that we skip package
> > management as it's too costly to implement correctly, and go for
> > per-library source distros instead which pushes the version lock
> > problem onto users to solve.
> How does significantly increasing the barrier to entry for current and new
> Boost users help your premise of saving Boost? Besides not agreeing with
> the premise, I just don't understand how it would do anything but hasten
> its demise.
I don't get how you get this interpretation.
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk