Re: [boost] [review] Convert library

Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Convert library
From: Vladimir Batov (Vladimir.Batov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-25 22:02:03

On 05/26/2014 11:32 AM, Vladimir Batov wrote:
>
> I did. I do not believe it covers all deployment scenarios. I can be 
> wrong though. That said, I have to qualms stepping back and letting 
> Jeroen to bring "coerce" back to life. I'll take someone else's work 
> any time (with commercial-development-specifics caveats). Less work 
> and hassle for me. Honestly, it'll be a relief. I am already exhausted 
> just going through this 2 weeks review.
>

Meant to say "I have NO qualms stepping back". In fact, I am beginning 
to think that I might have to retreat defeated (no drama). It is 
because, if my memory serves me, the majority of reviews had 
"conditional yes" votes which seems good on the surface of it. The 
complication (as I see it) though is that those conditions were along 
the lines "I vote yes if you change the interface to what I like"... 
which renders "no" for the interface under consideration.

I am happy to keep going (if decided so) but, truth be told, only a 
couple of reviews were in support of proposed interface and the rest 
were essentially "no"s due to "un-meet-able" :-) conditions... unless we 
can sum-up all the interface-related input into some concrete function 
signature... which I am happy to implement.