Subject: Re: [boost] pipeline concurrency proposal (was: Is there any interest in a library for actor programming?)
From: Benedek Thaler (thalerbenedek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-28 15:17:00
> It is almost exactly what I had in mind, except that the authors seem to
> not have realised the full generality of the approach. This worries me. Has
> the proposal progressed far towards standardization already?
> If I want to react to this proposal so that the standards committee knows
> about it, what should I do?
I'm also working on it, it's supported by GSoC.
Work in progress is at GitHub: https://github.com/erenon/pipeline
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk