Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] proposal and poll
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-30 08:31:25
Glen Fernandes wrote:
> It would be nice if both approaches (static configuration, automatic
> identification) take into account - or allow you to specify - conditional
> dependencies (e.g. dependencies based on identification of supported or
> unsupported features determined by Boost.Config).
It would be nice, but is it implementable? How could the dependency tracker
determine what Boost.Config will define?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk