Re: [boost] Moving workaround headers to [config]

Subject: Re: [boost] Moving workaround headers to [config]
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-31 16:31:34

Stephan T. Lavavej wrote:

> You should really look at _MSC_VER instead of _CPPLIB_VER which is 
> undocumented and unsupported. (The story is that _CPPLIB_VER is a 
> Dinkumware macro, and Microsoft doesn't promise that we'll always keep it, 
> or remember to update it for each major version. _MSC_VER is the compiler 
> major version macro, which for customers outside Microsoft always 
> corresponds 1:1 to the STL implementation.)

I'm not sure that this is true when using the Intel compiler.