Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] proposal and poll
From: Julian Gonggrijp (j.gonggrijp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-01 08:23:08
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Glen Fernandes wrote:
>> It would be nice if both approaches (static configuration, automatic identification) take into account - or allow you to specify - conditional dependencies (e.g. dependencies based on identification of supported or unsupported features determined by Boost.Config).
> It would be nice, but is it implementable? How could the dependency tracker determine what Boost.Config will define?
Tool detection using the <toolset> from Boost.Jam, perhaps combined
with some manual configuration, although it seems that Peter Dimov's
dependency traker might be sufficient.