Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] proposal and poll
From: Julian Gonggrijp (j.gonggrijp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-01 08:23:08
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Glen Fernandes wrote:
>> It would be nice if both approaches (static configuration, automatic identification) take into account - or allow you to specify - conditional dependencies (e.g. dependencies based on identification of supported or unsupported features determined by Boost.Config).
> It would be nice, but is it implementable? How could the dependency tracker determine what Boost.Config will define?
Tool detection using the <toolset> from Boost.Jam, perhaps combined
with some manual configuration, although it seems that Peter Dimov's
dependency traker might be sufficient.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk