Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal: Boost.Core
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-01 12:44:48
Andrey Semashev wrote:
On Sunday 01 June 2014 18:54:05 Peter Dimov wrote:
> > In particular, it seems to me that the 'winapi' subdirectory (plus
> > interlocked.hpp) should be its own library.
> I was thinking about Boost.Config as one of its purpose is to define a
> Boost-wide interface for setting the supported Windows version. Although I
> admit that many of the winapi/* headers may be updated as Boost libraries
> are developed (namely, Boost.Sync).
Doesn't look very Config to me, and is certainly likely to see active
development. It's a legitimate library, in my opinion. Plus, if it's
intended to be used by other libraries except Sync, it needs to have some
minimal documentation, if only to list what Windows API is provided, and by
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk