Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [pimpl] Some comments
From: Sohail Somani (sohail_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-06 10:16:55

On 06/06/2014 10:06 AM, Mostafa wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 05:57:57 -0700, Sohail Somani
> <sohail_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> That being said, projects have conventions and if it is a convention
>> for you, that's fine. I wouldn't make everyone use this convention
>> through Boost.Pimpl though.
> I agree with you, and that's why if you go back and look at the context
> of my response, I was writing with respect to
> pimpl<...>::pointer_semantics. No where did I make any suggestions on
> the use of pimpl<...>::value_semantics.

Glad we agree! I may have accidentally snipped out some context when I
quoted you originally: "When dealing with pimpl'd classes, the expected
norm (in my experience) for making deep copies is to use the clone

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at