Subject: Re: [boost] New dependency report
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-07 11:13:15
El 06/06/2014 23:40, Peter Dimov escribió:
> John Maddock wrote:
>> I'm tied of saying this.... but if mpl::bool_ and int_ were moved out
>> of MPL full, either to core, or to some mpl_core, then there's no need
>> to split type_traits anymore.
> The question is: what is the minimal conforming implementation of a type
> trait? Is it
> template<class T> struct something
> bool const value = false;
> or is it, instead,
> template<class T> struct something: mpl::false_
I would say the first one. I use my own true_/false_ wrappers in my
libraries just to avoid MPL dependencies.
To be standard conforming, we would need to add
"std::integral_constant<bool, false>" as "type" member. But IMHO this
seems a bit redundant.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk