Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Let's not forget the release
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-08 11:36:46


On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 9:09 AM, James Sharpe <mail_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On 8 Jun 2014 13:29, "John Maddock" <boost.regex_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>
> >> We don't have a viable release process in place yet, so we are going to
> >> have to make at least minimal changes.
> >>
> >> Straw man proposal:
> >>
> >> * On the 16th, (i.e. little more than a week from now) we turn off
> >> automatic sub-module master updates.
> >> * From that point until the release ships, a new library master release
> >> (with bug fixes only!) may be added manually to the Boost release by the
> >> release managers at their discretion. They have to be asked explicitly.
> >> * When the release ships, auto sub-module updates are turned back on.
> >
> >
> > That sounds sensible to me, John.
> >
> >
> Why do you need to stop the submodule updates for master? Surely the
> correct thing to do is create a branch that targets the release.
>

Interesting question. Unfortunately, we want to keep regression testing on
what will become the release, and don't have an automatic way to switch the
current master testers to a different branch.

Or do we? Rene?

--Beman


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk