Subject: Re: [boost] [Modularization] new Memory module
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-09 12:17:14
Glen Fernandes wrote:
> I'd prefer keeping align() and aligned_alloc() in Boost.Align.
Hypothetically speaking, it would've been nice if everything related to
alignment, such as boost::alignment_of, boost::type_with_alignment,
boost::aligned_storage, were part of Boost.Align. This makes sense from both
classification/user perspective and from dependency perspective.
Realistically, though, these things are grouped with the other type traits
in the standard, so... tough luck, I suppose.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk