Re: [boost] [Modularization] new Memory module

Subject: Re: [boost] [Modularization] new Memory module
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-10 06:22:45

Peter Dimov wrote:
> I suspect that the macro doesn't have one leading underscore

Good catch, it needed to be __CODEGEARC__

> Well congratulations then. :-)

Thanks! :-)

> I suggest we just prohibit references.
> We'll probably have to prohibit abstract types, too.

In that case should I keep it within boost::alignment::detail:: ?  --
If it was effectively an alignment_of-equivalent, it could live within
boost::alignment:: --

Glen