Subject: Re: [boost] [Modularization] new Memory module
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-10 06:22:45
Peter Dimov wrote:
> I suspect that the macro doesn't have one leading underscore
Good catch, it needed to be __CODEGEARC__
> Well congratulations then. :-)
> I suggest we just prohibit references.
> We'll probably have to prohibit abstract types, too.
In that case should I keep it within boost::alignment::detail:: ? --
If it was effectively an alignment_of-equivalent, it could live within
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk