Re: [boost] [range] why not adding conversion operator std::pair<FTI.FTI> to boost iterator_range

Subject: Re: [boost] [range] why not adding conversion operator std::pair<FTI.FTI> to boost iterator_range
From: Neil Groves (neil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-11 09:20:01

On 11 Jun 2014 13:25, "Andreas Fabri" <andreas.fabri_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
>
>
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to add a conversion operator to
> the class iterator_range?
>
> This would allow to write functions returning a range,
> instead of a pair of iterators, but boost::tie would
> still work with it.

Yes it is a good idea. It is already one of my scheduled tasks. I'm close
to doing this.
>
> Best regards,
>
> andreas
>
>
Regards,
Neil Groves
> --
> Andreas Fabri, PhD
> Chief Officer, GeometryFactory
> Editor, The CGAL Project
>
> phone: +33.492.954.912    skype: andreas.fabri
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost