Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [config] config_test fails on g++ 4.8/4.9
From: Michel Morin (mimomorin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-12 05:50:30

John Maddock wrote:
> Is this a corner case - in which case we should change the test case - or
> should lambda's be disabled with GCC (seems harsh?) - ah I see this is a
> result of a warning suppression change, I'll change the test to actually
> make use of the lambda - seems like the test case was too contrived.

Yep, let's not disable lambdas on gcc ;)

FYI, we can find gcc's bugs related to lambdas at
  [meta-bug] lambda expressions

Similarly we can find gcc's bugs on some specific C++ features such as

  [meta-bug] constexpr issues

by searching "meta-bug"


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at