Subject: Re: [boost] [config] config_test fails on g++ 4.8/4.9
From: Michel Morin (mimomorin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-12 05:50:30
John Maddock wrote:
> Is this a corner case - in which case we should change the test case - or
> should lambda's be disabled with GCC (seems harsh?) - ah I see this is a
> result of a warning suppression change, I'll change the test to actually
> make use of the lambda - seems like the test case was too contrived.
Yep, let's not disable lambdas on gcc ;)
FYI, we can find gcc's bugs related to lambdas at
[meta-bug] lambda expressions
Similarly we can find gcc's bugs on some specific C++ features such as
[meta-bug] constexpr issues
by searching "meta-bug"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk