Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] spirtit -> serialization
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-15 10:37:15
On Sunday 15 June 2014 15:43:20 Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> Le 15/06/14 15:07, Andrey Semashev a Ã©crit :
> > On Sunday 15 June 2014 15:44:49 Peter Dimov wrote:
> >> Andrey Semashev wrote:
> >>> What you mean why? Submodules are a constant pain to deal with. They
> >>> don't
> >>> allow the complete history of the library, they don't allow synchronized
> >>> operations on them (e.g. do changes to multiple submodules in a single
> >>> commit/push), adding or removing them requires privileges. In Log I have
> >>> at least 6 glue headers, I don't want to deal with 7 different repos if
> >>> they are extracted.
> >> I understood Vicente to mean a sub-sub-module.
> > When I read this:
> >> Yes, and I propose to create a date_time.serialization submodule that
> >> breaks the date_time -> serialization dependency.
> > I got the idea that Vicente meant the full fledged git submodule, with its
> > own repository. If we're talking about just structural changes within the
> > same submodule then the perspective changes.
> I requested on this list what was the criteria for associating a file to
> a module(sub-module) and Peter gave me the criteria. I'm just using it.
Ok, it was a misunderstanding on my side then, sorry.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk