Subject: Re: [boost] [utility] prior(it, n) for n being an unsigned type
From: Jürgen Hunold (jhunold_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-30 09:12:37
Am Montag, 30. Juni 2014, 13:19:33 schrieb Adam Romanek:
> > It broke some tests, see my recent post . This change won't be merged
> > to
> > master until these problems are resolved.
> The problem with the tests suggests that this change may also cause some
> regression in end-user code, but I guess there's nothing we can do about
> it (except for putting a few words in the release notes).
This definitely broke some code here. Some more words on how to adapt to the
changes will be appreciated. Or even a non-breaking fix.
-- * Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold ! * voice: ++49 4257 300 ! Fährstraße 1 * fax : ++49 4257 300 ! 31609 Balge/Sebbenhausen * jhunold_at_gmx.eu ! Germany
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk