Re: [boost] [utility] prior(it, n) for n being an unsigned type

Subject: Re: [boost] [utility] prior(it, n) for n being an unsigned type
From: Jürgen Hunold (jhunold_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-30 09:12:37

Hi Adam,

Am Montag, 30. Juni 2014, 13:19:33 schrieb Adam Romanek:
> > It broke some tests, see my recent post [1]. This change won't be merged
> > to
> > master until these problems are resolved.
> 
> The problem with the tests suggests that this change may also cause some 
> regression in end-user code, but I guess there's nothing we can do about 
> it (except for putting a few words in the release notes).

This definitely broke some code here. Some more words on how to adapt to the 
changes will be appreciated. Or even a non-breaking fix.

Yours,

Jürgen
-- 
* Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold  ! 
* voice: ++49 4257 300       ! Fährstraße 1
* fax  : ++49 4257 300       ! 31609 Balge/Sebbenhausen
* jhunold_at_gmx.eu             ! Germany