Subject: Re: [boost] [fusion] Definition for FUSION_MAX_MAP_SIZE
From: Joel de Guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-06-30 16:37:36
On 6/30/14, 11:44 PM, Agustín K-ballo Bergé wrote:
> On 30/06/2014 12:40 p.m., Edward Diener wrote:
>> On 6/30/2014 11:15 AM, Agustín K-ballo Bergé wrote:
>>> On 30/06/2014 09:26 a.m., Edward Diener wrote:
>>>> The documentation for fusion implies that FUSION_MAX_MAP_SIZE is defined
>>>> whenever a fusion header is included.
>>> It doesn't, it simply reserves the option for any header to define it or
>>> include a header that does. This is the general case for max sizes, and
>>> allows fusion to do things as implementing a container in terms of a
>>> different one.
>>>> What fusion header needs to be
>>>> included in order to bring in the definition for FUSION_MAX_MAP_SIZE ?
>>> As far as I can tell, `FUSION_MAX_MAP_SIZE` is only defined if you
>>> include <boost/fusion/container/map.hpp> and the implementation is
>> What do you mean by 'and the implementation is non-variadic' ?
> If the compiler has enough C++11 support, you'll get a variadic implementation:
> template <typename ...Ts> struct map;
> For such implementation, `FUSION_MAX_MAP_SIZE` makes no sense as there is no hard limit.
Yes, that is correct.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.ciere.com http://boost-spirit.com http://www.cycfi.com/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk