Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] ASIO in the Standard (was Re: C++ committee meetingreport)
From: Niklas Angare (li51ckf02_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-07-06 10:20:50

Next message: Marshall Clow: "Re: [boost] [1.56] Getting the release back on track - build errors"
Previous message: Erik Erlandson: "Re: [boost] [units] Pull request and RFC: information unit definitions for Boost.Units"
In reply to: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] ASIO in the Standard (was Re: C++ committee meeting report)"
Next in thread: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] ASIO in the Standard (was Re: C++ committee meetingreport)"
Reply: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] ASIO in the Standard (was Re: C++ committee meetingreport)"

"Niall Douglas" wrote:
> For me personally, how QNX (and I assume Hurd) do async i/o is the
> gold standard.

As a QNX user I'm curious about what you're referring to here.

Regards,

Niklas Angare

Next message: Marshall Clow: "Re: [boost] [1.56] Getting the release back on track - build errors"
Previous message: Erik Erlandson: "Re: [boost] [units] Pull request and RFC: information unit definitions for Boost.Units"
In reply to: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] ASIO in the Standard (was Re: C++ committee meeting report)"
Next in thread: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] ASIO in the Standard (was Re: C++ committee meetingreport)"
Reply: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] ASIO in the Standard (was Re: C++ committee meetingreport)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk