Subject: Re: [boost] [atomic] Structs with default constructor
From: Tim Blechmann (tim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-07-08 03:15:02
>>> this will lead to the point that boost.lockfree is broken on the clang
>>> toolchain, because the issue which you introduced is *exactly* the same
>>> issue as with std::atomic in libc++ .
>>> i know more than one project for which this issue is a showstopper ...
>> I didn't see that Boost.Lockfree was broken. Ok, I'll try to resolve this
>> before the release.
> Turned out to be simpler than I anticipated.
thanks a lot!!!!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk